Program quality indicators
Supply, demand, and enrollment
| Indicators | 2016-17 | 2017-18 | 2018-19 | 2019-20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spots available | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 |
| Applications received | - | 89 | 77 | 132 |
| Newly enrolled students | 58 | 58 | 53 | 38 |
Origin
| Students come from… | 2016-17 | 2017-18 | 2018-19 | 2019-20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The same university | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| The Catalan University System (SUC) | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Other Spanish universities | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Foreign universities | 58 | 56 | 53 | 38 |
| TOTAL | 58 | 58 | 53 | 38 |
Program faculty suitability
Faculty by category and PhD
| 2019-20 | URL PhD Assistant Professor | URL Lecturer | URL Professor | URL Contracted PhD | Guest Faculty | URL Associate Professor | Total | % Total Prof. | % Accredited Faculty (ANECA/ AQU)* |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PhDs | 0 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
4 |
9 |
69% |
89% |
|
Non-PhDs |
0 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
31% |
- |
| TOTAL |
0 |
5 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
4 |
13 |
100% |
- |
*Calculated based on URL/Esade faculty
Percentage of classroom teaching hours delivered (HIDA) by faculty category and PhD
|
2019-20 |
URL PhD Assistant Professor |
URL Lecturer |
URL Professor |
URL Contracted PhD |
Guest Faculty |
URL Associate Professo |
Others* |
Total HIDAs |
% Total HIDAs |
% HIDAS by Accredited Faculty (ANECA/ AQU) HIDAs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PhDs |
0 |
3 |
3 |
47.5 |
0 |
78 |
304 |
435.5 |
78.8% |
89% |
|
Non-PhDs |
0 |
117 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
117 |
21.2% |
- |
|
TOTAL |
0 |
120 |
3 |
47.5 |
0 |
78 |
304 |
552.5 |
100% |
- |
|
% |
0% |
22% |
1% |
9% |
0% |
14% |
55% |
|
|
|
* These HIDAs are taught by faculty from two international schools participating in the program. Specifically, these HIDAs are distributed as follows: PhD faculty = 102 hours (Lingnan) and 156 hours (McIntire) and non-PhD faculty = 0 hours (Lingnan) and 20 hours (McIntire), respectively.
Percentage of classroom teaching hours delivered (HIDA) by faculty track
|
2019-20 |
Research Track |
Period of Teaching* |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
None |
Inactive track |
Active track |
None |
Inactive track |
Active track |
|
MGSM |
150 |
0 |
98.5 |
65.4 |
0 |
184 |
|
60% |
0% |
40% |
26% |
0% |
74% |
|
*The teaching track does not apply to private universities; calculated based on faculty participating in the Docentia Program.
**Note: Figures correspond solely to HIDAs at Esade because international faculty from partner schools (Lingnan and McIntire) aren't included in this process (limited to Spain).
Full-time students per full-time faculty
| 2019-20 | Full-time faculty | Full-time students | Ratio* |
|---|---|---|---|
| MGSM | 1.04 | 38 | 1/12 |
*Table constructed solely based on HIDAs at Esade and, consequently, a third of all students.
General satisfaction with faculty
| From 1 to 7 | 2016-17 | 2017-18 | 2018-19 | 2019-20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MGSM | ||||
| - Compulsory courses | 6.4 | 6.2 | 6.3 | 6.4 |
| - Electives | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Student satisfaction with learning support systems
Student satisfaction with learning support systems
| 2019-20 AQU | From 1 to 5 | AQU response rate |
|---|---|---|
| 2. The Master's program is well-organized (course coordination and sequence, schedule, calendar, etc.). | 4.4 | 18.4% |
| 11. The facilities and specialized resources (classrooms, labs, computer equipment, library, research equipment, etc.) were appropriate. | 5 |
Program outcomes and quality
Graduate satisfaction with the overall educational experience
| 2018-19 AQU Survey indicators | From 1 to 5 | % response |
|---|---|---|
| 5. The teaching methodology favoured my learning. | 4 | 18.4% |
| 10. I'm satisfied with the Final Master's Project (TFM). | 4 | |
| 13. The education received helped me to improve my personal skills (self-confidence, independent learning, creativity, solving new problems, critical analysis, teamwork, etc.) | 4.6 | |
| 15. I'm satisfied with the Master. | 4.4 | |
| 16. If I had to start all over again, I would choose the same Master's program. | 100% Yes | |
| 17. If I had to start all over again, I would choose the same school. | 100% Yes |
Overall academic outcomes
| Indicators | 2016-17 | 2017-18 | 2018-19 | 2019-20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 99.9% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Efficiency | 100.0% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Graduation | NA | 100% | 98.28%* | 92.5% |
| Attrition | 1.7% | 1.7% | 5% | 7,5% |
* Cohort beginning 2017-18.
Job placement
| 2019-20 Indicators | Values relative to the total cohort | |
|---|---|---|
| Placement | Employed | 50% (100% of active workers) |
| Unemployed | 0% | |
| Inactive | 34% | |
| No information | 16% | |
| Related to the program | 100% | |
| Adequacy (functions) | University-related | 0% |
| Not university-related | 0% | |