Academic indicators

Program quality indicators

Supply, demand, and enrolment

Indicators 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22
Spots available 165 180 180 180 180 180
Applications received 608 615 546 332 308 517
Newly enrolled students 189 189 186 186 184 182

Origin

Students come from… 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22
The same university 2 1 0 0 0 3
The Catalan University System (SUC) 4 3 14 0 0 0
Other Spanish universities 3 3 1 9 4 6
Foreign universities 180 179 171 177 180 173
TOTAL 189 186 186 186 184 182

Complementary courses for the corresponding programs

Indicators 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22
Students with degrees carrying out complementary courses 100%* 100%* 100%* 100%* 100% 100%
Average number of complementary course credits completed 0 2 ECTS 2 ECTS 2 ECTS 2 ETCS 2 ECTS

* The complementary courses are divided into compulsory and voluntary courses. 100% of graduates participated because these supplemental courses are required.

 

 

Program faculty suitability

 

Faculty by category and according to doctorate credentials

2021-22 URL PhD Assistant Professor URL Lecturer URL Professor URL Contracted PhD Others* URL Associate Professor   Total Prof. % Total Prof. % Accredited Faculty (ANECA/ AQU)
PhDs 1 1 3 24 1 17   47 71% 79%
Non-PhDs 1 18 0 0 0 0   19 29% -
TOTAL 2 19 3 24 1 17   66 100% -

*Others: Guest faculty

 

Percentage of classroom teaching hours delivered (HIDA) by faculty category and PhD

2021-22 URL PhD Assistant Professor URL Lecturer URL Professor URL Contracted PhD Others* URL Associate Professor Total Prof. % Total Prof. % HIDAS by Accredited Faculty (ANECA/ AQU)
PhDs 28 28 95.6 1,032.9 63.5 897.8 2,145.8 74% 80%
Non-PhDs 30 733.8 0 0 0 0.0 763.8 26% -
TOTAL 58 761.8 95.6 1,032.9 63.5 897.8 2,909.6 100% -
  2% 26% 3% 35% 2% 31%      

 

Percentage of classroom teaching hours delivered (HIDA) by faculty track

2021-22 Research Track Period of Teaching
  None Inactive track Active track None Inactive track Active track
MBA 1,353.1 91 1,465.5 1,049.8 384.1 1,475.7
  47% 3% 50% 36% 13% 51%

 

Full-time students per full-time faculty

2021-22 Full-time faculty Full-time students Ratio
MBA 12.1 292 1/24

 

General satisfaction with faculty

From 1 to 7 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22
MBA            
Core courses 6.2 5.8 5.7 5.6 6 5.8
Specialised 6,4 6.3 6.3 6 6.2 6.4

 

Student satisfaction with learning support systems

 

Student satisfaction with learning support systems

2021-22 AQU From 1 to 5 AQU response rate
2. The Master's program is well-organized (course coordination and sequence, schedule, calendar, etc.). 4.3 27.6%
12. The master's degree has given me opportunities to access a research and/or professional community. 4.4
14. The training received has allowed me to improve my abilities to develop my professional activity. 4.5

 

Student satisfaction with material resources

2021-22 AQU From 1 to 5 AQU response rate
11. The specialized facilities and resources (classrooms, laboratories, computer equipment, library, research equipment, etc.) have been adequate. 4.6 27.6%

 

Program outcomes and quality

 

Graduate satisfaction with the overall educational experience

AQU Survey indicators From 1 to 5 % responsive
4. The content of the subjects is adapted to the educational profile of the master's degree. 4.4 27.6%
5. The teaching methodology favoured my learning. 4.4
6. The assessment systems have made it possible to adequately reflect my learning. 4.0
7. The volume of work required is consistent with the number of credits in the subjects and the TFM. 4.4
8. I am satisfied with the teaching staff. 4.2
9. I am satisfied with the external internship. 3.9
10. I'm satisfied with the Final Master's Project (TFM). 4.1
13. The education received helped me to improve my personal skills (self-confidence, independent learning, creativity, solving new problems, critical analysis, teamwork, etc.) 4.6
15. I'm satisfied with the Master. 4.3
16. If I had to start all over again, I would choose the same Master's program. 16% No 
84% Yes
17. If I had to start all over again, I would choose the same school. 26% No 
74% Yes

 

Overall academic outcomes

Indicators 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22
Performance 99.7% 99.2% 98.13% 99.4% 99.2% 98.9%
Efficiency 97.4% 97.9% 97.08% 98.8% 97.5% 100%
Graduation 98.8% 99.4% 97.9% 95.7% 94.7% 93.5%
Attrition 0.6% 6.4% 2.12% 3.2% 2.1% 0,5%

 

Job placement

Cohort 2021-22 Indicator Values relative to the total cohort
Placement Employed 64% (91% of active workers)
Unemployed 6%
Inactive 26%
No information 4%
Adequacy (functions) Related to the program 100%
University-related 0%
Not university-related 0%