Academic indicators

Indicators of the Quality of the training program

Supply, demand, and enrolment

Indicators 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22
Places available  160 140 140 140 180
Applications received 374 306 187 296 550
Newly enrolled students 131 138 133 193 177

 

Origin
 

Students come from--- 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22
The same university 3 9 8 13 6
The Catalan University System (SUC) 10 11 0 0 0
Other Spanish universities 0 3 5 6 3
Foreign universities 118 115 120 174 168
TOTAL 131 138 133 193 177

 

Complementary courses for the corresponding programs
 

Indicators 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22
Students with degrees carrying out complementary courses 29 38 34 50 47
Average number of complementary course credits completed 18 ECTS 18 ECTS 18 ECTS 18 ECTS 18 ECTS

Indicators of the Suitability of teaching staff for the training program

Faculty by category and according to doctorate credentials

2021-22 URL PhD Assistant Professor URL Lecturer URL Profesor URL Contracted PhD Others* URL Associate Professor Total % Total Prof. % Accredited professor (ANECA /AQU)
PhD  2 3 5 10 1 10 31 63% 84%
No PhD 0 18 0 0 0 0 18 37% -
TOTAL 2 21 5 10 1 10 49 100% -

* Others: Visiting and guest faculty, etc.

 

Classroom teaching hours delivered (HIDA) by faculty category and PhD
 

2021-22 URL PhD Assistant Professor  URL Lecturer URL Professor URL Contracted PhD Others* URL Associate Professor Total % Total HIDAs % HIDAs by Accredited Faculty (ANECA /AQU)
PhDs 68 50.5 111 555.8 25 489.5 1,299.8 74% 79%
Non-PhDs 0 446 0 0 0 0 446 26%  
TOTAL 68 496.5 111 555.8 25 489.5 1,745.8 100%  
  4% 28% 6% 32% 1% 28%      

* Others: Visiting and guest faculty, etc.

 

Percentage of classroom teaching hours delivered (HIDA) by Faculty Track
 

2021-22 Research Track Teaching Track*
  None Inactive Track Active Track None Inactive Track Active Track
MIM 1,158 0 587 583.4 111.3 1,051
66% 0% 34% 33% 6% 60% 

*The teaching track does not apply to private universities; calculated based on faculty participating in the Docentia Program.

 

Full-time students for full-time faculty
 

2021-22 Full-time faculty Full-time students Ratio
MIM 7.3 177 1/24

 

General Satisfaction with faculty
 

From 1 to 7 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22
MIM          
- Compulsory courses 5.7 5.8 5.6 6.2 5.9
- Electives 5.7 6.1 5.9 6 5.7

Satisfaction Indicators of the Effectiveness of learning support systems

Student satisfaction with the learning support systems

2021-22 AQU Survey Indicators

MIM

from 1 to 5

AQU response rate
2. The Master's program is well-organized (course coordination and sequence, schedule, calendar, etc) 3.8

31%

12. The master's degree has given me opportunities to access a research and / or professional community. 3.9
14. The training I received has allowed me to improve my skills to develop my professional activity. 4.1


Program outcomes and quality

2021-22 AQU Survey Indicators

MIM

from 1 to 5

AQU response rate
11. The facilities and specialized resources (classrooms, labs, computer equipment, library, research equipment, etc.) were appropriate. 4.1

31%

 

Graduate satisfaction with the overall educational experience

 

2021-22 AQU Survey Indicators

MIM

from 1 to 5

% response

4. The content of the subjects is adapted to the training profile of the master's degree. 3.7

31%

5. The teaching methodology favoured my learning 4.0
6. Assessment systems have adequately reflected my learning. 3.5
7. The volume of work required is consistent with the number of credits of the subjects and the TFM. 4.1
8. I am satisfied with the faculty. 3.7
9. I am satisfied with external internships. 3.8
10. I'm satisfied with the Final Master's Project (TFM) 3.9
13. The education received helped me to improve my personal skills (self-confidence, independent learning, creativity, solving new problems, critical analyis, teamwork, etc) 4.3
15. I'm satisfied with the Master 3.9
16. If I had to start all over again, I would choose the same Master's Program 31% No
69% Yes
17. If I had to start all over again, I would choose the same school 22% No
78% Yes

 

Overall Academic Outcomes
 

Indicators  2017-18 2018-19 2018-19 2020-21 2021-22
Performance  99.1% 98.42% 97.2% 99.4% 99.1%
Efficiency  92.2% 94.58% 100% 98% 99.4%
Graduation 93.1% 93.89% 90.5% 93.9% 87.6%
Attrition 7.6% 6.11% 5.8% 5.3% 6.2%

 

Job Placement
 

2021-22   Values Relative to the total cohort
Placement Employed 45% (94% of active workers)
Unemployed 3%
Inactive   39%
No information 13%
Adequacy (Functions) Related to the program 100%
University-related 0%
Not university-related 0%