Program quality indicators
Supply, demand and enrolment
| Indicators | 2017-18 | 2018-19 | 2019-20 | 2020-21 | 2021-22 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spots available | 360 | 360 | 370 | 415 | 450 |
| Applications received | 1,320 | 1,216 | 1,639 | 1,136 | 3,244 |
| Newly enrolled students | 358 | 378 | 386 | 423 | 447 |
Origin
| Indicators | 2017-18 | 2018-19 | 2019-2020 | 2020-21 | 2021-22 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University entrance exam (PAU) | 100% | 93% | 59% | 46% | 43% |
| Others | 0% | 7% | 41% | 54% | 57% |
| TOTAL | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Program faculty suitability
Faculty by category and PhD
| 2021-22 | URL Professor | URL Contracted PhD | URL Associate Professor | URL Lecturer | URL PhD Assistant Professor | Others* | Total Faculty | % Total Faculty | % Accredited Faculty (ANECA/AQU) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PhDs | 8 | 24 | 31 | 14 | 7 | 0 | 84 | 58% | 73% |
| Non-PhDs | 60 | 60 | 42% | - | |||||
| TOTAL | 8 | 24 | 31 | 74 | 7 | 0 | 144 | 100% | - |
* Others: 1 Emeritus + 1 Guest
Percentage of classroom teaching hours delivered (HIDA) by faculty category and PhD
| 2021-22 | URL Professor | URL Contracted PhD | URL Associate Professor | URL Lecturer | URL PhD Assistant Professor | Others* | Total HIDAs | % Total HIDAs | % HIDAS by Accredited Faculty (ANECA/AQU) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PhDs | 478.9 | 1,299.2 | 2,310.1 | 1,145.8 | 355 | 0 | 5,589.0 | 54% | 77% |
| Non-PhDs | 4,759.1 | 4,759.1 | 46% | - | |||||
| TOTAL | 478.9 | 1,299.2 | 2,310.1 | 5,904.9 | 355 | 0 | 10,348.1 | 100% | - |
| 5% | 13% | 22% | 57% | 3% | 0% |
* Others: 1 Emeritus + 1 Guest
Percentage of classroom teaching hours delivered (HIDA) by faculty track
| 2021-22 | Research Track | Period of Teaching* | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| None | Inactive track | Active track | None | Inactive track | Active track | |
| BBA | 8,062.0 | 464.0 | 1,822.1 | 6,085.7 | 508.3 | 3,754.1 |
| 78% | 4% | 18% | 59% | 5% | 36% | |
* The teaching track does no apply to private universities; calculated based on faculty participating in the Docentia Programme
Full-time students per full-time faculty
| 2021-22 | Full-time faculty | Full-time students | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| BBA | 43.1 | 1.662.0 | 1/39 |
General satisfaction with faculty
| From 1 to 7 | 2017-18 | 2018-19 | 2019-2020 | 2020-21 | 2021-22 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BBA | Compulsory courses | 6.1 | 5.8 | 5.9 | 6 | 6.1 |
| Electives | 6.1 | 6.1 | 6.2 | 6.3 | 6.3 |
Student satisfaction with learning support systems
Student satisfaction with learning support systems
| 2020-21 AQU | From 1 to 5 | % response |
|---|---|---|
| 6. Tutorials were useful and helped to improve my learning. | 3.9 | 27.4% |
| 14. Student support services (information, registration, academic procedures, scholarships, orientation, etc.) provided me with good advice and care. | 3.8 | |
| 15. I have received adequate response to my complaints and suggestions | 3.5 | |
| 19. The training received has allowed me to improve my professional skills | 4.5 |
Student satisfaction with material resources
| 2020-21 AQU | From 1 to 5 | % response |
|---|---|---|
| 7. Using the virtual campus has made my learning easier | 4.3 | 27.4% |
| 12. The facilities (classrooms, teaching spaces, auditoriums...) have been adequate to promote my learning | 4.7 | |
| 13. The resources provided by the library and teaching support services have met my needs | 4.3 |
Program outcomes and quality
Graduate satisfaction with the overall educational experience
| Indicators 2021-22 | From 1 to 5 | % response |
|---|---|---|
| 1. The curriculum's structure allowed my learning to progress adequately. | 4.5 | 27.4% |
| 4. I am satisfied with the teaching staff | 4 | |
| 8. The assessment systems have allowed my learning to be adequately reflected | 4.1 | |
| 9. The external internships allowed me to apply the knowledge acquired during the program | 4.3 | |
| 11. The final degree project was useful, helping me to consolidate all the program competencies | 4 | |
| 18. The education received helped me to improve my personal skills (self-confidence, leadership, independent learning, creativity, solving new problems, critical analysis, teamwork, etc.) | 4.4 | |
| 20. I am satisfied with the qualification | 4.4 | |
| 21. If I had to start all over again, I would choose the same program | 13% No 87% Yes |
|
| 22. If I had to start all over again, I would choose the same school | 14% No 86% Yes |
Overall academic outcomes
| Indicators | 2017-18 | 2018-19 | 2019-20 | 2020-21 | 2021-22 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 98.7% | 95.7% | 97.3% | 97.4% | 95.1% |
| Efficiency | 95.9% | 96.9% | 95.7% | 96.7% | 98.6% |
| Graduation | 77.7% | 76.3% | 74.1% | 72.3% | 68.0% |
| Attrition | 4.2% | 3.48% | 3.20% | 6.10% | 7.20% |
Overall first-year outcomes
| Indicators | 2017-18 | 2018-19 | 2019-2020 | 2020-21 | 2021-22 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Attrition | 3.9% | 3.23% | 1.1% | 7.5% | 5.3% |
| Students sitting final exams (of total enrolled students) | 97.1% | 99.8% | 99.3% | 98.4% | 98.5% |
| Success | 96.4% | 97.1% | 96.6% | 97.0% | 96.1% |
| Performance | 93.5% | 96.9% | 95.9% | 95.5% | 94.6% |
Job placement
| Indicators 2021-22 | Values relative to the total cohort | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Placement | Employed | BBA: 45% (70% of active workers) GBD: 25% (100% of active workers) |
|
| Unemployed | BBA: 3% GBD: 0% |
||
| Inactive | BBA: 44% GBD: 68% |
||
| No information | BBA: 10% GBD: 7% |
||
| Adequacy (functions) | Related to the program | 100% | |
| University-related | 0% | ||
| Not university-related | 0% | ||